Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
Federal Politics

Busting Four Damaging Myths about Community Housing

And why we need to look beyond the private sector to fix this crisis.

Yushu Zhu, Hanan Ali, Meg Holden and Natasha Mhuriro 14 May 2024The Conversation

Yushu Zhu is an assistant professor of urban studies and public policy at Simon Fraser University. Hanan Ali is an assistant researcher in housing policy, Meg Holden is a professor of urban studies and resource and environmental management and Natasha Mhuriro is an assistant researcher in public policy, all at SFU. This article was originally published on the Conversation.

Canada’s Housing Plan is pledging an ambitious multilateral approach to build more housing, faster and cheaper, for diverse groups.

It includes noteworthy new funding programs and policies to preserve and expand community housing, including social, non-profit and co-operative housing.

After decades of homeowner-centred policies, the new Tenant Protection Fund and Renters’ Bill of Rights commit more protections for tenants from excessive rent increases, forced evictions and other threats to their tenancies.

But the new housing plan fails to meet the high expectations for a human rights approach to housing, with only limited responses to rent/vacancy control and housing financialization.

It continues to prioritize the supply of market housing and pays short shrift to community housing.

Canada’s ongoing housing crisis extends beyond affordability and supply challenges. It also involves homelessness, risks to tenancy, shortage of accessible units, financialization and the lack of culturally adequate housing.

Community housing is poised to effectively tackle these insidious problems in ways the market cannot.

Huge potential for housing improvements

Our newly released podcast series, Demystifying Community Housing, found a strong consensus among residents, academics, and housing and policy practitioners that the community housing sector has huge potential.

Accounting for just under four per cent of total housing stock, this sector faces significant barriers. The persistent neoliberal mindset underpinning Canadian housing policy has resulted in a culture of home ownership and market supremacy. The community housing sector has been siloed and snubbed, and considered secondary to home ownership and for-profit rental markets.

Our podcast highlights countrywide conversations on the myths and realities of community housing, its limits and potential — as well as its past, present and future — through social, economic and political lenses.

Prevalent skepticism and misperceptions have impeded public acceptance and political will for serious policy engagement in community housing.

This is partly due to its small size, but also stems from inconsistent uses of the term “community housing” in relation to social housing and affordable housing in policy, statistics and practice.

Let’s dissect some common myths:

Myth 1: All community housing is government-subsidized

Community housing refers to housing that is owned and/or operated by governments, non-profit housing societies or housing co-operatives.

Subsidized housing, or social housing, constitutes an important part of community housing. But not all community housing projects receive government subsidies; many have a mix of social housing, below market-rate rental units and some market rental housing.

Episode 1 of the podcast delves into community housing models with varying governance structures, rent-setting schemes and tenant demographics. An underlying common thread is these models prioritize affordability and stability over profit.

Myth 2: Community housing is only for the most vulnerable

Canada’s community housing to date has prioritized low-income people and those with complex housing needs, such as seniors or those on the verge of homelessness. But a small yet important segment of market-rate units house moderate- to middle-income Canadians who would otherwise be pushed out of the for-profit market.

Community housing cannot and should not serve only the most vulnerable. The podcast reveals how Canada’s social housing system once had a welfare model that served broader income groups. However, this system gradually targeted the most vulnerable due to public divestment.

It has become a common belief that community housing is scarce and should be therefore preserved only for vulnerable populations in the greatest need. This belief normalizes the scarcity of community housing instead of seeing that scarcity as a policy problem.

Canada has one of the smallest community housing sectors among countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The concentration of low-income and vulnerable households in this sector only reinforces stigmas and stereotypes about it.

The podcast explores different community housing systems and how to reimagine a future with alternative models of community housing, including integrated rental systems. It also explores Black-led housing initiatives and the Indigenization and decolonization of housing solutions.

Myth 3: Community housing in disrepair, dangerous

The physical and social environments of community housing projects are common concerns.

Many believe community housing buildings are in disrepair. Although some aged housing stock has deteriorated and there are higher maintenance costs, that isn’t universal or inherent to community housing.

The 2021 Canadian Housing Survey revealed only 16 per cent of community housing tenants were unsatisfied with their living conditions. The situation is most acute in Manitoba, where only seven per cent of community housing stock is in good or excellent condition, compared to 61 per cent in British Columbia and one-third in Ontario.

There are also concerns about the social environment in community housing arising from ethno-cultural stereotypes about low-income and vulnerable populations.

However, residents and housing operators told the podcast that community housing has provided their diverse communities with affordable homes, a stable life, a social support network and occasional opportunities for asset building.

Although some community housing tenants face challenges engaging in social life, there is a strong desire for social connectedness and peer support.

Myth 4: Community housing is financially unsustainable

The financial viability of community housing projects is often met with skepticism. But one housing expert told the podcast how community housing projects can be financially sustainable through break-even rents that are set at a level to offset project costs over time.

Unlike for-profit developments, community housing projects can also eliminate profit margins to ensure they’re affordable or reinvest profit into the community.

Further affordability can be achieved through public lands, low-interest loans and/or cross-subsidies between units. The economies of scale of an expanded community housing sector could further lower the costs of these projects.

Building a strong community housing sector

Community housing is not a silver bullet to Canada’s housing crisis. But a strong and resilient community housing sector can play a significant role in fulfilling the rights of Canadians to adequate housing.

Despite challenging funding and policy environments, our podcast illuminates community housing success stories and how tenants are supported through innovative practices, multi-sectoral partnerships and the embrace of social entrepreneurialism.

Significant challenges and limitations threaten the continued growth of the sector, necessitating a broad and holistic understanding of what community housing actually is and can do.The Conversation  [Tyee]

Read more: Federal Politics, Housing

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion and be patient with moderators. Comments are reviewed regularly but not in real time.


  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Keep comments under 250 words
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others or justify violence
  • Personally attack authors, contributors or members of the general public
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed


The Barometer

Should Fossil Fuel Ads Be Restricted?

Take this week's poll