Independent.
Fearless.
Reader funded.
News
Environment

‘Fire Weather’ Is Hitting the North the Hardest, Study Says

In the worst region, bordering BC and the Yukon, extreme conditions increased by 1.8 days every year over two decades.

Amanda Follett Hosgood 7 Jan 2025The Tyee

Amanda Follett Hosgood is The Tyee’s northern B.C. reporter. She lives in Wet’suwet’en territory. Find her on X @amandajfollett.

Canada’s northern regions have seen increasingly longer wildfire seasons in recent decades, with the number of days conducive to severe burning rising most steeply in B.C.’s far north, according to a recent study.

The findings, published last week in Science, are from a University of British Columbia study led by Weiwei Wang, a research scientist with Natural Resources Canada’s Northern Forestry Centre.

Wang’s research used data and modelling in 10 ecozones across Canada to determine the driving forces behind the ecological impact of a wildfire, also known as “burn severity.” Weather, fuel and topography were used as predictors of burn severity, according to the report.

The study examined wildfire severity over a 40-year period, splitting the time frame into two periods, from 1981 to 2000 and from 2001 to 2020.

“The year 2000 has been identified as a global turning point in climate change, with increasingly extreme weather events having been observed since then,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers found that dry conditions were the main cause of increased wildfire severity in Canada and that northern regions were most influenced by the effects of climate change. While summer months were more prone to severe burning, they found that the rising number of additional burning days occurred mostly in the spring and fall.

Over the 40-year study period, the number of severe burning days increased, on average, by a half day every year across all ecozones.

A map shows a cluster of red dots in B.C.’s north. There are orange dots scattered in other regions.
A research paper published last week in Science indicates that the number of high burn severity days in Canada began to rise sharply at the start of the new millennium. That was especially true in northern BC, which saw 1.8 additional burn days each year between 2001 and 2020. Map from Weiwei Wang et al., ‘Canadian Forests Are More Conducive to High-Severity Fires in Recent Decades,’ Science 387, 91-97 (2025).

The study found the steepest increase occurred over the study’s latter half, between 2001 and 2020, when about half the ecozones studied showed “significant changes in the mean annual most severe potential.”

One of the ecozones studied, the “boreal cordillera,” which covers northern B.C. and southern Yukon, showed the greatest increase in high burn severity days over the latter period, with 1.8 days added each year between 2001 and 2020. The boreal cordillera was closely followed by two neighbouring ecozones covering northern Yukon and the western Northwest Territories, which saw an increase of 1.5 days every year over the same period.

Comparing 2023 to previous time periods

In 2023, B.C. experienced its most destructive wildfire season on record. The Donnie Creek fire in the province’s northeast burned over 6,000 square kilometres to become the largest in B.C.’s history. It wasn’t declared out until August 2024.

BC Wildfire Service blamed the record-breaking blaze on prolonged drought and “highly volatile boreal spruce fuel types.”

That was reflected in the recent report’s findings.

“The 2023 estimates demonstrate widespread escalation in high burn severity days compared with the past 40 years,” according to the recent study. “In this extreme fire year, more severe conditions were found in the northwest and northeast areas [of Canada], corresponding to the record-breaking large fires that occurred in British Columbia, Alberta, the Northwest Territories and Quebec.”

Diversifying forests to reduce wildfire risk

Countrywide, regions with the most high or moderate burn severity days “were primarily located in the areas dominated by coniferous forests in the northwestern uplands and northeastern region.”

Areas containing many low burn severity days were “mainly in the southern broadleaf and mixed-wood forests and in the southwestern mountain forests,” the report found.

Asked if diversifying B.C.’s forests, which are primarily conifer, could help fire resilience in the province, author Wang said it could.

“Broadleaf and mixed-wood forests may offer some resilience with lower burn severity potential compared to coniferous forests,” Wang wrote in an email to The Tyee. “However, these forests remain vulnerable to severe burns, particularly in spring and autumn, under conducive weather conditions.”

While elevation and slope were shown to have some influence on fire severity, topography “showed no foremost influence.”

The researchers emphasized the “pressing need for proactive strategies to mitigate the increasing threat posed by climate change.”

They said they hoped the report’s findings would assist fire management practices such as risk assessments and prescribed burning.  [Tyee]

Read more: Environment

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion and be patient with moderators. Comments are reviewed regularly but not in real time.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Keep comments under 250 words
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others or justify violence
  • Personally attack authors, contributors or members of the general public
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Are You Worried about Trump’s Tariffs?

Take this week's poll